russian girls hair styles

Even the most avid abdulsubhan096.blogspot.com clickers might not have noticed the uniting factor across the spring 2015 catwalks. It wasn't anything so dramatic as scarlet lips or as romantic as high blush. But it
was there, complementing the golden tromp O'Neil lip rings and Goa-appropriate caftans at Dries Van No ten, as well as the Row’s cult-leader robes, the starched white collars at Chanel and Isabel Amaranths perennial heather ed crewnecks. It looked like nothing. And in many ways it was. Adjectiveless in color, lank and complete with flyaways, non-hair appeared again and again: not “chocolate,” not “chestnut,” not bluntly cut nor superlative in length. This was passive-aggressive hair, proof that the head from which it came looked enviable without any help at all.If the ombre of seasons past telegraphed a beachy disregard for appointments and status quo, non-hair is a full-out (if faux) throw-the-Filofax-away refusal. And in its visually subtle noncompliance, it more successfully captures the laissez-faire attitude that imbues so many attempts at stylized apathy: dewy skin, unpolished nails, the proud and public consumption of Coca-Cola (not Diet). According to Garren, the hairstylist and co-founder of the hair-care line R+Co, designers for a few seasons were scrambling for models with short hair, shag and bowl cuts. Now the look is no look: “a real girl with hair tucked behind her ears.” The allure, of course, is in the apparent effortlessness — and the tantalizing threat of a thwarted approximation. The desire for drab non-hair rekindles that specifically middle-school shame of trying, and failing, to achieve the perfectly undone ponytails of girls more popular than yourself.